+1 on the full constructor.
GreG
On Aug 9, 2010, at 3:58 PM, Edson Tirelli <tirelli(a)post.com> wrote:
I thought about adding that, but I feel like we would just be reimplementing java, in
this case. So, if you need anything else other than simple java beans, you should
implement it as a java class.
Regarding the constructor, I might still add a constructor that receives all fields as
parameters, just to reduce verbosity when using the java dialect, but if you are using
mvel dialect, you can use "with":
rule ...
when ...
then
with( person = new Person() ) {
name = "Bob",
age = 35
}
insert( person );
end
Edson
2010/8/9 Tina Vießmann <tviessmann(a)stud.hs-bremen.de>
Hi,
is it possible to define a function/constructor inside a fact type
declaration? If yes, how can it be done?
Thank you :)
Tina
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss by Red Hat @
www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users