Hi,
Is this what you are looking for?
rule "A requires B"
when
$fact1: NodeFact(id == "A", selected == true, $b: b)
$fact2: NodeFact(this == $b, selected == false, this DESCENDANT-OF $fact1)
then
$fact2.setSelected(true);
end
Best,
2010/5/7 Giovanni Motta <mottagio(a)gmail.com>
Hi all, i have a question concerning facts hierarchy, i'm looking
for some
hint as i suppose the same problem could have been faced by someone on the
list.
I try to eplain with an example:
- Suppose to have a tree of facts, each object representing an UI widget.
<root>
<A id="1">
<B />
</A>
<A id="2">
<B />
</A>
</root>
- The individual elements A(1), B, A(2), B are mapped to facts, that are
inserted in a KnowledgeStatefulSession
- A rule exists that states that when an object A is selected, the B object
is automatically selected
- An event occurs that causes selection of node A(1)
The expected result is, obviously, that only the B element that is
descendant of A(1) must be automatically selected
I'm trying a way to express the 'descendant' relationship in LHS construct.
The rule will look like:
rule "A requires B"
when
$fact1: NodeFact(id == "A", selected == true)
$fact2: NodeFact(id == "B", selected == false, this DESCENDANT-OF $fact1)
then
$fact2.setSelected(true);
end
What is, in your opinion, the best way to handle this situation? What
should replace the fake "DESCENDANT-OF" match?
Do i need to use a function that returns the list of descendant nodes of
$fact1 and then match $fact2 against that?
Will this be fast when dealing with large trees?
Any suggestion will be appreciated, thank you.
Giovanni
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti