Thanks all, I'll have a look into it.
Regarding DRL / CLP on mobile: For example, late's assume we have a central server
using Drools as rule engine. Now there is a need for native mobile apps that should work
"fluently" and which should also be able to function properly without internet
connection.
To date it's not uncommon that it comes down to really ugly hardcoded implementations.
Parts of the workflow and logic / validation has to be re-implemented on every mobile
platform, because the options for business rule engines that work on all platforms is very
limited. Language-wise, there is no Java on iOS and Windows Phone 8. But there is C/C++
possible for all platforms.
So in my opinion mobile applications could greatly benefit from a possibility to
understand at least the parts of rules of that central instance which they have to
implement in some way.
Or am I thinking in the wrong direction?
Ben
It could be my imagination only, but I think the possibility to define a process once for
a parent server instance and being able to execute (parts of the process) temporarily
elsewhere, without needing that big parent server for every piece of logic, is something
that is currently missing.
I'm confused, what's this to do with DRL and CLP?
Mark
Ben
Von: Mark Proctor <mproctor@codehaus.org<mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>>
Antworten an: Rules Users List
<rules-users@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>>
Datum: Freitag, 31. Mai 2013 00:16
An: Rules Users List
<rules-users@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>>
Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Translate Drools to CLIPS rules
drools-clips was both a parser and a shell. The parser basically converted clp fr drl, to
then be executed in a shell. There was however no interested in the project at all, so we
discontinued it.
The parser and converter might be salvageable, if the project is rescoped simply at a clp
to drl translation layer, it might be easier to re-include it again. I suspect as well a
reduced scope in effort, will make it easier for people to get involved.
So if anyone wants to give that a go, to rip open drools-clips, get the parser and
translator out, and get it working with 6.0.0.SNAPSHOT. That would be great :)
Mark
On 30 May 2013, at 21:16, "Stadin, Benjamin"
<Benjamin.Stadin@heidelberg-mobil.com<mailto:Benjamin.Stadin@heidelberg-mobil.com>>
wrote:
Hi,
I'm interested in possibilities to convert (one-way) Drools to CLIPS rules. I've
followed the discussion about the canceled support for the CLIPS parser in Drools
("Drools Clips", last reply 2 Feb 2013). However, are there any options left to
make a one-way conversion?
My interest in this is that I currently do a little research about how to fill the gap
between central business rule engines and business process implementation and execution on
smartphones / tablets (iOS, Android, Windows Phone 8). Currently I'm under the opinion
that good old CLIPS could theoretically be a common denominator to enable common rule
definition, and partial execution of these on mobile devices.
Regards,
Benjamin Stadin
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users