Re: [rules-users] firing rules without modifying activations

Wow! This is quite an idea! Actually I AM using insertLogical() already but I never thought about using them for this particular problem. I actually think that your Idea is quite brilliant as it not only solves my initial problem but also introduces the possibility to split "detaction" and "action". As you already stated, it is absolutely true, that we will probably have a list of problem indications (detections) and a separate list of problem solutions (action) which can have more than just ono-to-one links. Thanks for the fast response and this great idea! I'm currently in the final stages of my PhD thesis, but once I'm done, I'll gladly put some information about our project on the webpage you mentioned. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/firing-rules-without-modifying-activations-tp196235... Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.