Natraj,
Globals were not designed to be available in functions, unless they are
sent in as parameters in the way you did in your second example.
[]s
Edson
2007/7/2, Natraj Gudla <natraj.gudla(a)gmail.com>:
Hello,
I am using Drools 3.0.6. While using a global variable in a function, the
compiler complains it cannot resolve the global variable name. Something
like below
*
global
* com.*sample*.ExampleLogger *customLogger*;*
function
* *void* logMessage(String msg){
customLogger.logMessage("Log Message from the function");
}
In the above code, it complains "customLogger cannot be resolved". I am
able to refer the global in the consequence of a rule directly. What is the
problem using the reference within a function.
On the other hand, i am able to do something like
* *
function *void* logMessage(ExampleLogger custLogger,String msg){
custLogger.logMessage(msg+
" Accept gloabal as function parameter");
}
and call from the consequence of a rule : logMessage(customLogger); // I
am passing the global to the function as an argument and then use it to log
a message.
This way is working. But not the first way of using the global in the
function.
Any help??
Thanks
--
Natraj Gudla
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @
www.jboss.com