Re: [rules-users] Adding a custom operator to drools?

Hi Edson, thanks for the quick reply... Edson Tirelli wrote: > It depends if you are talking about Drools 4 or 5. You are right > about Drools 4. Drools 5 has "quasi-pluggable" operators... hehehe :) Sorry, didn't mention it. I was talking about the 4.0.x series. This leads to the following. > For more info, look at the EvaluatorDefinition interface in Drools 5 > and its several implementations for examples. Well, how stable and usable (eclipse integration?) is drools 5? (I am using the drools rule engine mostly; not the BRMS) While I may not need top notch stability and can cope with some changes to the codebase over time ( research project ), Drools only is one part of a pretty complicated application. So far, this was the major reason for not having a closer look in the new version. > BTW, most important thing that I forgot to mention: we obviously are > interested in feedback and contributions on the feature, from simple > ideas and suggestions to actual patches and improvements! Well, we agree here. The previous two posts were ment to start some discussion. Now - as I need this feature rather sooner than later - I am looking into the implementation. JIRA ticket with more will follow if I am sucessfull. cu, Michael _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users