Re: [rules-users] From 4.0.6 to 4.0.4 to 4.0.3
Chris Woodrow wrote:
Its "unnaccptable"? that we don't maintain free community
resources at our descretion? If binaries are not available for
download, you can always build your own:
http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/tags/
You are right "unacceptable" was not the appropriate word, I am sorry
about that and you are right about the own build.
I did know about the priority support on the paid version but I did
not know about downloads and QA. Do you mean that paid version does
insure backward compatibility?
We use serialisation for deployment so it's hard
to ensure backwards
compatabilty there - this is why we added the re-build button to the
BRMS.. MVEL is also the bad culprit here as it breaks serialisation
compatability from minor release to minor release.
In general the paid version is the version that comes as part of the
JBoss SOA-P platform, but is available standalone. This binary release
is not available publicly and goes through extra levels of QA and
interoprability testing.
https://www.redhat.com/apps/store/jboss/rules.html
http://www.redhat.com/jboss/benefits/
Chris
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.6 KB)