Edson,
I figured I must have missed some docs explaining changes required for
the upgrade. If I suspected this was an inherent problem with the 5.0
release I'd have supplied lots of info. I am inferring from the response
that there are no known issues with 5.0 upgrade so I'll do my own
investigation for a while. Let's hope I find something unrelated to the
Drools.
Scott
Edson Tirelli [5/28/2009 12:52 PM] wrote:
Scott,
As others already mentioned, your e-mail does not help much. We
need to know what is "unacceptably slow". How much slower is that?
10%, 100%, 1000%? Also, we need a description of your use case: what
kind of rules do you use, how many rules, how many facts, etc.
Finally, we need a way to reproduce the problem.
So, if you can provide more info, we might be able to help.
[]s
Edson
2009/5/28 Scott Reed <sreed(a)avacoda.com <mailto:sreed@avacoda.com>>
I just upgraded our app from Drools 4 to 5 libraries. We just use
the rules engine with DRL. The performance of the engine on our
rulebase is unacceptably slow. I assume there is something we
need to do to our rules or the way we are configuring the engine
to fix this. I don't see anything in the release notes about
backwards compatibility issues. I would very much appreciate it if
someone would direct me to any documentation that explains what
needs to be done so our 4.0 rules perform at least as well as they
did before the upgrade?
Thanks,
Scott
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @
www.jboss.com <
http://www.jboss.com>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users