Re: [rules-users] expert mailing list

From my side I am mostly interested in Planner so a

>From my point of view, the user list is becoming increasingly cluttered with Qs regarding Guvnor, which doesn't interest me at all. A parallel list guvnor-users(a)lists.jboss.org might help. -W On 15 August 2012 10:12, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Personally, I don't find the user list "high volume". > > Perhaps re-categorizing the mailing lists we have works better:- > > - users: newbie type stuff > > > - dev (rename drools-tech?): technical questions (not just > implementation) > > My 2c. > > On 15 August 2012 00:33, Salaboy <salaboy(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> Probably a linked in private group can do the job, I dont know if it >> supports all the features that you mention but at least you have the >> contacts network to checks who joins and post new topics. With a group of >> moderators the topics can be restricted easily >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 14 Aug 2012, at 22:48, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org&gt; wrote: >> >> > As the user list is now high volume, i'm contemplating an "invite >> only" expert list. I'm not sure who this would work, or if it's practical. >> But the idea is to have a lower volume list, with a higher quality of >> technical questions and discussions. This might make it easier for people >> to be engaged. >> > >> > I'm thinking of doing it as a google group "drools-expert-group" or >> something. >> > >> > I'm not entirely sure how to decide who gets an invite or not…. as >> it's very arbitrary. I guess in general anyone who gets a recommendation >> for someone on the list, gets an invite. But I'm open to other ideas to run >> this. >> > >> > Ideally we should be able to setup a number of moderators, that can >> handle this invite list, including people from the community. Although not >> sure if google groups supports this, need to find out. >> > >> > Anyway would like to here what people think, and would be interest to >> see alternative ways to do this. Maybe you can point to existing setups, >> that manage this sort of situation, that we can copy? >> > >> > Mark >> > _______________________________________________ >> > rules-users mailing list >> > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users