Hi All, Can someone tell me how to use create enums with Dynamic values in Guvnor. For example I need enum which does not contain static value like A,B,C rather these A,B,C values come from database. Nilima From: rules-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org Date: 03/12/2010 10:36 PM Subject: rules-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 55 Sent by: rules-users-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org Send rules-users mailing list submissions to rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to rules-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org You can reach the person managing the list at rules-users-owner(a)lists.jboss.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of rules-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: OutOfMemoryError on Marshalling with non-existence check in flow XOR split (heldeen) 2. Re: high sailence event/utility rules and ruleflows (H.C.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:49:03 -0800 (PST) From: heldeen <heldeen(a)overstock.com&gt; Subject: Re: [rules-users] OutOfMemoryError on Marshalling with non-existence check in flow XOR split To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org Message-ID: <1268408943169-444246.post(a)n3.nabble.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I think I need to clarify a few things. First the OOME is not in running the rules but on marshalling the state for the flow, which I do after each command using a custom CommandService that marshals the session after each command is executed. Second, the ValidationRuleFlowGroup is only going to insert a ValidationResult() if there is something that is invalid. So a valid set of facts would have no ValidationResult() in memory, hence wanting to split to a "valid" branch on "not ValidationResult()". -- View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/OutOfMemoryError-with-non-existence-check-in-flow-XO... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:36:16 -0800 (PST) From: "H.C." <canterburry(a)gmail.com&gt; Subject: Re: [rules-users] high sailence event/utility rules and ruleflows To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org Message-ID: <1268411776720-444339.post(a)n3.nabble.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Thanks, I tried this but I don't see my ruleflow group rules coming back and re-processing once the high priority auto focus rules in my new "maintenance" agenda group have executed. Do my rules in my ruleflow group now also need an agenda group and auto-focus set to be re-evaluated? -- View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/high-sailence-event-utility-rules-and-ruleflows-tp44... Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users End of rules-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 55 ******************************************* =====-----=====-----===== Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you