4:58 a.m.
I am now using Cobertura to evaluate the test coverage on my Java
application.
However, Drools rules are not counted by Cobertura, because classes for
rules are dynamically created and therefore not instrumented by Cobertura
for static analysis.
How can we automatically analyze the test coverage on Drools rules?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-Analyze-Rule-T...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
5:11 a.m.
Your can use the various EventListeners like ProcessEventListener to
collect statistics about rule execution while your tests are executing.
On 21/01/2011 11:58, hyjshanghai wrote:
I am now using Cobertura to evaluate the test coverage on my Java
application.
However, Drools rules are not counted by Cobertura, because classes for
rules are dynamically created and therefore not instrumented by Cobertura
for static analysis.
How can we automatically analyze the test coverage on Drools rules?
5:43 a.m.
Yes, this can be the low-level infrastructure to implement the functionality
comparable to that of Cobertura, which I think is not practical for we rule
engine users to do without much effort.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-Analyze-Rule-T...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
6:58 a.m.
You could use Drools-Verifier to check things like Range Validation, Missing
equality, Redundancy, etc.
Here you have some kind of documentation:
http://community.jboss.org/wiki/DroolsVerifier (Toni promised me that he
would update it some time ago...)
Best Regards,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
- Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com
- Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 7:43 AM, hyjshanghai <hyjshanghai(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, this can be the low-level infrastructure to implement the
functionality
comparable to that of Cobertura, which I think is not practical for we rule
engine users to do without much effort.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-Analyze-Rule-T...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
1:06 a.m.
Verifier is not much help if your trying to solve the runtime coverage.
You can get the rules that fired using an AgendaFilter.
ksession.fireAllRules( new AgendaFilter() {
public boolean accept(Activation activation) {
// Your code here.
}
}
Toni
On Jan 21, 2011, at 1:58 PM, Esteban Aliverti wrote:
You could use Drools-Verifier to check things like Range Validation,
Missing equality, Redundancy, etc.
Here you have some kind of documentation: http://community.jboss.org/wiki/DroolsVerifier
(Toni promised me that he would update it some time ago...)
Best Regards,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
- Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com
- Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 7:43 AM, hyjshanghai <hyjshanghai(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, this can be the low-level infrastructure to implement the functionality
comparable to that of Cobertura, which I think is not practical for we rule
engine users to do without much effort.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-Analyze-Rule-T...
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
4933
days inactive
4936
days old
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Corneil du Plessis -
Esteban Aliverti -
hyjshanghai -
Toni Rikkola