2:28 p.m.
I'm wondering if anybody has comparison info with other engines. I just
started to evaluate the products
not sure which factors to consider. But I have these requirements:
Must Be
1)Free or inexpensive product.
2)Rules change frequently, level of effort should be minimum.
3)Multiple join condition (A rule is determined ranging from 1 to 10 data
fields.)
4)Should support approximately 75 rules.
Better if we have.
1)Change Rules dynamically if possible.
2)Ease of use for Business users and developers.
3)Rule versioning.
Will be happy if any one can send me rule comparison document or suggest me
which tools can i use to evaluate.
Thanks,
Lindy
4:02 p.m.
By your given criteria, due to price, I don't think we have any
competition :)
Mark
Lindy hagan wrote:
I'm wondering if anybody has comparison info with other engines.
I
just started to evaluate the products
not sure which factors to consider. But I have these requirements:
Must Be
1)Free or inexpensive product.
2)Rules change frequently, level of effort should be minimum.
3)Multiple join condition (A rule is determined ranging from 1 to 10
data fields.)
4)Should support approximately 75 rules.
Better if we have.
1)Change Rules dynamically if possible.
2)Ease of use for Business users and developers.
3)Rule versioning.
Will be happy if any one can send me rule comparison document or
suggest me which tools can i use to evaluate.
Thanks,
Lindy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
4:25 p.m.
2009/4/17 Lindy hagan <lindyhagan(a)gmail.com>
I'm wondering if anybody has comparison info with other engines.
I just
started to evaluate the products
not sure which factors to consider. But I have these requirements:
It has to be a production rule system or any rule system (logic programming,
deductive databases, triples rule engines)? Check the benchmarks at:
http://rulebench.projects.semwebcentral.org
The benchmarks may have features which you might not need, and not all the
tested systems are free. Its main goal was to compare technologies, but it
might help you decide what system you want.
Regards,
Paul Fodor
Must Be
1)Free or inexpensive product.
2)Rules change frequently, level of effort should be minimum.
3)Multiple join condition (A rule is determined ranging from 1 to 10 data
fields.)
4)Should support approximately 75 rules.
Better if we have.
1)Change Rules dynamically if possible.
2)Ease of use for Business users and developers.
3)Rule versioning.
Will be happy if any one can send me rule comparison document or suggest me
which tools can i use to evaluate.
Thanks,
Lindy
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
4:44 p.m.
The Guvnor feature of Drools makes things easier for Business users and
is great for version control!
| Jonathan Ingold | jonathan.ingold(a)jackson.com | PH: & FAX:
517-367-3827 | Business Rules Developer | Jackson National Life
Insurance | http://www.jackson.com <http://www.jackson.com/> | Please
note that all Jackson e-mail addresses have changed from @jnli.com to
@jackson.com.
________________________________
From: Lindy hagan [mailto:lindyhagan@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 2:28 PM
To: rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: [rules-users] Comparison info with other engines
I'm wondering if anybody has comparison info with other engines. I just
started to evaluate the products
not sure which factors to consider. But I have these requirements:
Must Be
1)Free or inexpensive product.
2)Rules change frequently, level of effort should be minimum.
3)Multiple join condition (A rule is determined ranging from 1 to 10
data fields.)
4)Should support approximately 75 rules.
Better if we have.
1)Change Rules dynamically if possible.
2)Ease of use for Business users and developers.
3)Rule versioning.
Will be happy if any one can send me rule comparison document or suggest
me which tools can i use to evaluate.
Thanks,
Lindy
5486
days inactive
5486
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Ingold, Jonathan -
Lindy hagan -
Mark Proctor -
Paul Fodor