4:34 p.m.
Big thanks on the answers, that was all I needed.
The XML solution seems to be the best for me.
Thanks for the help again. Best Regards
Milen
-------- Оригинално писмо --------
От: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com
Относно: Re: [rules-users] How to call Drools as a remote rules executor
До: Rules Users List
Изпратено на: Понеделник, 2013, Декември 9 17:11:53 EET
On 09/12/2013, milen igrachev igrachev(a)abv.bg > wrote:
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Hello again,
I am sorry that i duplicated the question!.
I have one last question and I will close my questions both in
stackoverflow
and here.
Is my understanging correct? I have two options:
1. To have my business logic classes in my java Drools project.
Certainly.
2. Find a way to generate these classes in my java Drools project.
But in any case available I do need the java classes to create and
feed
facts to the Drools? There is no way to feed Drools with any type of
structured data that defines the fact without creating the instance?
(It
will be my responsibility to find the way of generation.)
Well, there's the DRL declare, which is one way of defining fact types
to Drools.
But you'd still have to create objects from these fact types and to inject the
data (in the constructor). Which means that you'll have to have a way
of creating these declares, and a way of getting the data into the
Java app encapsulating the Drools session, and a way of instantiating
the objects.
As I said on stackoverflow, using XML as a gofer might be easier: it's
simple on the Java side, but I don't know the other end.
-W
Once again Big thanks for your time, and sorry for the duplication of
the
question!
Regards,
Milen
PS: About the language that I am using its really uncommon one, I
seriously
doubt that the name will help you. Offcourse here it is - GraphTalk.
From: Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com
About: Re: [rules-users] How to call Drools as a remote rules
executor
To: Rules Users List
sent at: Monday, 2013, December 9 13:27:22 CET
I've provided one possible approach on stackoverflow.
[Not knowing what "non-Java" is doesn't help.]
-W
On 09/12/2013, milen igrachev igrachev(a)abv.bg > wrote:
> Hello ,
> What I want to do is use java and Drools for its nice rule
engine
> capabilities. Currently I am not using java for my project. I
have some
> implementation business classes and implemented logics that works
fine
> for
> me, but I want to externalize the rules in BRMS. I gave Drools a
try and
> I
> like it a lot. However I encounter one obsticle that I want to
ask if I
> can
> skip. I read most of the Drools documentation and across the net
in all
> the
> examples that are given we actually need the implementation
business
> classes
> in order to instantiate facts that we want to feed to the Drools
> KieSession . Well what I want is not to duplicate my class model
in both
> my
> (non java) project and my java Drools project. All I want to keep
in my
> Drools project is the Rules themselves. So is that possible, or
I will
> need
> to duplicate the models? If anyone knows where I can read some
info on
> that
> topic links are appriciated! Technical details: I am using
Drools 6.0.0
> in
> Eclipse Juno. Big thanks for the support! Best Regards!
Milen
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
3783
days inactive
3783
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
milen igrachev -
Wolfgang Laun