9:14 p.m.
Hi,
We are contemplating using Drools in our project.
We need the following info:
Is Drools jdk1.3 compatible?
Can we use it for jdk1.3 based project?
Thanks
RV
9:50 p.m.
No its not JDK1.3 compatible. I've heard somene has done a port, but
they haven't provided the code.
Mark
Arvind Patil wrote:
Hi,
We are contemplating using Drools in our project.
We need the following info:
Is Drools jdk1.3 compatible?
Can we use it for jdk1.3 based project?
Thanks
RV
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
9:56 p.m.
Hi Mark,
If Drools is not jdk1.3 compliant, then could you suggest any other
open-source jDK1.3-based Rule Engine that is as good as DROOLS is in terms
of algorithm used, performance etc?
-RV
On 1/21/07, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
No its not JDK1.3 compatible. I've heard somene has done a port, but they
haven't provided the code.
Mark
Arvind Patil wrote:
Hi,
We are contemplating using Drools in our project.
We need the following info:
Is Drools jdk1.3 compatible?
Can we use it for jdk1.3 based project?
Thanks
RV
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing
listrules-users@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Regards,
Arvind.
10:41 p.m.
You have drools 2.5 - but thats a very different beast. There are no
other open source rules engines really. Have you maybe tried an older
version of jess?
Mark
Arvind Patil wrote:
Hi Mark,
If Drools is not jdk1.3 compliant, then could you suggest any other
open-source jDK1.3-based Rule Engine that is as good as DROOLS is in
terms of algorithm used, performance etc?
-RV
On 1/21/07, *Mark Proctor* <mproctor(a)codehaus.org
<mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote:
No its not JDK1.3 compatible. I've heard somene has done a port,
but they haven't provided the code.
Mark
Arvind Patil wrote:
> Hi,
> We are contemplating using Drools in our project.
> We need the following info:
> Is Drools jdk1.3 compatible?
> Can we use it for jdk1.3 based project?
>
> Thanks
> RV
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Regards,
Arvind.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
1:58 a.m.
Why do you say that Drools 2.5 is a "different beast"?
Could you please elaborate on that?
Regards
RV
On 1/21/07, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
You have drools 2.5 - but thats a very different beast. There are no other
open source rules engines really. Have you maybe tried an older version of
jess?
Mark
Arvind Patil wrote:
Hi Mark,
If Drools is not jdk1.3 compliant, then could you suggest any other
open-source jDK1.3-based Rule Engine that is as good as DROOLS is in terms
of algorithm used, performance etc?
-RV
On 1/21/07, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
>
> No its not JDK1.3 compatible. I've heard somene has done a port, but
> they haven't provided the code.
>
> Mark
> Arvind Patil wrote:
>
> Hi,
> We are contemplating using Drools in our project.
> We need the following info:
> Is Drools jdk1.3 compatible?
> Can we use it for jdk1.3 based project?
>
> Thanks
> RV
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing
listrules-users@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Arvind.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing
listrules-users@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Regards,
Arvind.
6:45 a.m.
On 1/22/07, Arvind Patil <arvind1905(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Why do you say that Drools 2.5 is a "different beast"?
Could you please elaborate on that?
There are a huge array of changes since 2.5 - completely different rule
format, the internals have been rewritten (more complete RETE
implementation, etc), IDE support, and so on. And assuming you see all or
most of these as improvements, you could argue that Drools 2.5 isn't as good
a rule engine.
That said, if it does the job for you, it's a viable choice -- we still have
projects using 2.5, and it's not posing a problem for us.
- Geoffrey
--
Geoffrey Wiseman
6:45 a.m.
The differences are too big to go into here. We have a page summarising
2.x to 3.0 migration, thats your best starting point:
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Drools2Migration
Mark
Arvind Patil wrote:
Why do you say that Drools 2.5 is a "different beast"?
Could you please elaborate on that?
Regards
RV
On 1/21/07, *Mark Proctor* <mproctor(a)codehaus.org
<mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote:
You have drools 2.5 - but thats a very different beast. There are
no other open source rules engines really. Have you maybe tried an
older version of jess?
Mark
Arvind Patil wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> If Drools is not jdk1.3 compliant, then could you suggest any
> other open-source jDK1.3-based Rule Engine that is as good as
> DROOLS is in terms of algorithm used, performance etc?
>
> -RV
>
>
> On 1/21/07, *Mark Proctor* <mproctor(a)codehaus.org
> <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote:
>
> No its not JDK1.3 compatible. I've heard somene has done a
> port, but they haven't provided the code.
>
> Mark
> Arvind Patil wrote:
>> Hi,
>> We are contemplating using Drools in our project.
>> We need the following info:
>> Is Drools jdk1.3 compatible?
>> Can we use it for jdk1.3 based project?
>>
>> Thanks
>> RV
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Arvind.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
<https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users>
--
Regards,
Arvind.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
6628
days inactive
6629
days old
6 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Arvind Patil -
Geoffrey Wiseman -
Mark Proctor