outstanding. thanks very much.
On Mar 14, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Edson Tirelli wrote:
Yes, JBRULES-1611. I just fixed this and committed to revision
#25650. It will be in the next release.
[]s
Edson
2009/3/14 Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org>
Garrett Conaty wrote:
>
> I've got an odd parse case that I'm hoping the parser wizards could
> confirm is the same as the bug JBRULES-1611:
>
> This works
>
> not (exists (Event(eval
> (eventDate.after(CalendarUtil.getDateDaysPast(30)))) from
> $room.events))
>
>
> but this doesn't
>
> forall( Event(eval
> (eventDate.before(CalendarUtil.getDateDaysPast(30)))) from
> $room.events )
>
> It's like doing math proofs all over again. Technically I think
> I've got to fix the logic because !< is >-= rather than >.
I believe there is already a JIIRA for saying that 'from' doesn't
work with 'forall'
>
> Thanks,
> Garrett
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @
www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users