thomaskukofka <at> web.de wrote: > Hello, > > some people write about wrapping the Drools API with an own access API > for integration in the application. > Sorry for the perhaps stupid question, but what is the reason for > this? Does this only make sense if I'm thinking about changing the > rule engine one day? yes they do this for rule engine independance. > If I'm not intending to change the rule engine from Drools to another, > so isn't it the same if the developpers has to use the native Drools > API or an self-written access API? > > Regards > Tom > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users <at> lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list

rules-users <at> lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users