Hi Benjamin,
Your assumptions are correct - not so green after all :)
Technical Rules are just plain text DRL, so whatever drools-expert supports
is possible.
TBH, I've not heard of anybody else using traits (or attempting to) in
Guvnor, so any feedback would be great.
AFAIK, "experimental" means some things might need smoothing out - sotty or
conan will know exactly the status; I'm pretty confident they are to remain.
With kind regards,
Mike
On 22 June 2012 22:33, BenjaminWolfe <benjamin.e.wolfe(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Sure.
So if I did author rules in Guvnor using traits, I would (1) write a
technical rule to declare the trait, (2) write a technical rule to don that
trait given whatever LHS pattern, and (3) write another technical rule to
make use of the trait in a useful way -- all of which I would do without a
GUI, but that's OK if I can handle some rules syntax. Did I get that
right?
Also, when I run test cases will Guvnor know what to do with the traits?
(My hunch is yes, because the stuff behind the scenes is all the same.)
Lastly -- again I'm a greenhorn -- does experimental mean you might abandon
the feature, or just that it might need honing?
By the way, in the etiquette, it just means not to send entire messages
just
to say "Thanks," right? I mean it's not just that programmers are so
cranky
they don't want you to be nice? :D
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Does-Guvnor-Support-Traits-tp4018176p40...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users