12:06 p.m.
Ciao,
I'm using 6.1.0.Final - btw, thank you for this release!
I have an issue as sometimes I'm getting an NPE from the RightTupleList, as
documented in the snippet of stacktrace below. Unfortunately, I'm not able
to provide as I did in the past a reproducer, because this error occurs
only occasionally after the application has been running for quite some
time - this error does not happen with the rule unit tests suite.
Therefore I would like to ask you the following questions, please.
1. would the stacktrace below be enough for you to possibly identify the
kind of error which is happening in this case?
2. shall I go ahead and raise a JIRA just with this information? I've
checked on JIRA but couldn't find any "similar" issue for this case
Finally, if the answers are both "no", does it mean that the only way I
could provide an helpful feedback, is to log all the session incoming facts
indefinitely, so to later "craft" an log-replay reproducer; or would you
suggest another way I can do this more efficiently?
Thank you very much in advance for your feedback
Ciao
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.drools.core.util.index.RightTupleList.matches(RightTupleList.java:264)
[drools-core-6.1.0.Final.jar:6.1.0.Final]
at
org.drools.core.util.index.RightTupleIndexHashTable.get(RightTupleIndexHashTable.java:433)
[drools-core-6.1.0.Final.jar:6.1.0.Final]
at
org.drools.core.util.index.RightTupleIndexHashTable.getFirst(RightTupleIndexHashTable.java:114)
[drools-core-6.1.0.Final.jar:6.1.0.Final]
at
org.drools.core.reteoo.BetaNode.getFirstRightTuple(BetaNode.java:430)
[drools-core-6.1.0.Final.jar:6.1.0.Final]
at
org.drools.core.phreak.PhreakJoinNode.doLeftInserts(PhreakJoinNode.java:94)
[drools-core-6.1.0.Final.jar:6.1.0.Final]
at
org.drools.core.phreak.PhreakJoinNode.doNode(PhreakJoinNode.java:60)
[drools-core-6.1.0.Final.jar:6.1.0.Final]
at
org.drools.core.phreak.RuleNetworkEvaluator.switchOnDoBetaNode(RuleNetworkEvaluator.java:548)
[drools-core-6.1.0.Final.jar:6.1.0.Final]
at
org.drools.core.phreak.RuleNetworkEvaluator.evalBetaNode(RuleNetworkEvaluator.java:534)
[drools-core-6.1.0.Final.jar:6.1.0.Final]
at
org.drools.core.phreak.RuleNetworkEvaluator.innerEval(RuleNetworkEvaluator.java:334)
[drools-core-6.1.0.Final.jar:6.1.0.Final]
at
org.drools.core.phreak.RuleNetworkEvaluator.outerEval(RuleNetworkEvaluator.java:161)
[drools-core-6.1.0.Final.jar:6.1.0.Final]
at
org.drools.core.phreak.RuleNetworkEvaluator.evaluateNetwork(RuleNetworkEvaluator.java:116)
[drools-core-6.1.0.Final.jar:6.1.0.Final]
at
org.drools.core.phreak.RuleExecutor.evaluateNetwork(RuleExecutor.java:77)
[drools-core-6.1.0.Final.jar:6.1.0.Final]
at
org.drools.core.common.DefaultAgenda.evaluateEagerList(DefaultAgenda.java:990)
[drools-core-6.1.0.Final.jar:6.1.0.Final]
at
org.drools.core.common.DefaultAgenda.fireNextItem(DefaultAgenda.java:945)
[drools-core-6.1.0.Final.jar:6.1.0.Final]
at
org.drools.core.common.DefaultAgenda.fireAllRules(DefaultAgenda.java:1234)
[drools-core-6.1.0.Final.jar:6.1.0.Final]
at
org.drools.core.impl.StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.fireAllRules(StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.java:1239)
[drools-core-6.1.0.Final.jar:6.1.0.Final]
at
org.drools.core.impl.StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.fireAllRules(StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.java:1212)
[drools-core-6.1.0.Final.jar:6.1.0.Final]
at
(...).ChronologicalEngine.insertPolicyAdvanceInsertFire(ChronologicalEngine.java:381)
[classes:]
at (...).ChronologicalEngine.inject(ChronologicalEngine.java:284)
[classes:]
12:40 p.m.
Hi Matteo,
it's honestly virtually impossible to figure out what's causing that NPE
just looking at that stack trace. Do you think you could be able to develop
a reproducer or at least provide us a bit more information?
Thanks,
Mario
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-RightTupleList-NPE-with-6-1...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
4:31 a.m.
Hi Mario, thank for your response and I can totally understand.
My next question is, please: is it possible to submit a JIRA on jboss.org
and keep it confidential ?
Or at least keep confidential the reproducer?
The problem I'm facing, assuming I eventually develop the reproducer, that
I seriously doubt my friends would agree in sharing this rulebase on a
public domain - on other occasions it was okay to share the rulebase, while
on other occasions the rulebase was limited so I "translated" the rulebase
to another domain.
My ultimate goal here would be to reach a compromise where I can deliver
you guys of the drools team a precise reproducer, while at the same time
keep my friends happy that the rulebase is not actually shared on public
domain and kept confidential only for the scope of reproducing the bug.
So my friends questions will likely be:
1. is there a process to raise a jira on jboss.org with confidential
content ?
2. which terms and conditions, or NDA, do apply in that case?
I've done research on drools documentation, and on jboss and RH website,
but couldn't find an answer applying for this case. In other words, I
wonder if RH sub. model is the only means to share confidential content, or
it is possible also for the opensource version, in order to achieve the
compromise I pictured above.
Thanks
Ciao
ps: sorry for the rather lengthy email but I wanted to provide a picture of
the context :)
Matteo
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Mario Fusco <mario.fusco(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Matteo,
it's honestly virtually impossible to figure out what's causing that NPE
just looking at that stack trace. Do you think you could be able to develop
a reproducer or at least provide us a bit more information?
Thanks,
Mario
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-RightTupleList-NPE-with-6-1...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
7:25 a.m.
On 6 Aug 2014, at 10:31, Matteo Mortari <matteo.mortari(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Mario, thank for your response and I can totally understand.
My next question is, please: is it possible to submit a JIRA on jboss.org and keep it
confidential ?
Or at least keep confidential the reproducer?
Not on JIRA, but you can open a jira
and then provide a dropbox link to Mario, Myself or Edson.
The problem I'm facing, assuming I eventually develop the reproducer, that I
seriously doubt my friends would agree in sharing this rulebase on a public domain - on
other occasions it was okay to share the rulebase, while on other occasions the rulebase
was limited so I "translated" the rulebase to another domain.
My ultimate goal here would be to reach a compromise where I can deliver you guys of the
drools team a precise reproducer, while at the same time keep my friends happy that the
rulebase is not actually shared on public domain and kept confidential only for the scope
of reproducing the bug.
So my friends questions will likely be:
1. is there a process to raise a jira on jboss.org with confidential content ?
2. which terms and conditions, or NDA, do apply in that case?
I've done research on drools documentation, and on jboss and RH website, but
couldn't find an answer applying for this case. In other words, I wonder if RH sub.
model is the only means to share confidential content, or it is possible also for the
opensource version, in order to achieve the compromise I pictured above.
Thanks
Ciao
ps: sorry for the rather lengthy email but I wanted to provide a picture of the context
:)
Matteo
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Mario Fusco <mario.fusco(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Matteo,
it's honestly virtually impossible to figure out what's causing that NPE
just looking at that stack trace. Do you think you could be able to develop
a reproducer or at least provide us a bit more information?
Thanks,
Mario
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-RightTupleList-NPE-with-6-1...
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
3762
days inactive
3763
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Mario Fusco -
Mark Proctor -
Matteo Mortari