12:38 p.m.
Hi,
i am trying to validate start time stamp and current date.
1.start_timestamp can not be =< Current Date this is the condition.
Any one work on this type of thing pls give me some suggestion.write this
condition is DSL File.
Thanks,
Manya..
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-write-the-validation-timestamp-lessthan-curr...
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
5:05 p.m.
New subject: How to write the validation timestamp lessthancurrent date using drools
Manya,
please do not open two threads for almost the same question!
1.end_timestamp must be > start_timestamp this is the condition.
1.start_timestamp can not be =< Current Date this is the condition.
First, I think, "can not be <=" is the same as "must be >".
Drools is able to compare timestamps as primitive number types or as
java.util.Date's. So without DSL you can directly (no matter, what type the
timestamps are):
SomeClass(startTimestamp < endTimestamp, startTimestamp > $currentTimestamp)
where $currentTimestamp is a variable binding done earlier in the rule.
Since clock support is introduced not until Drools 5, you have to insert a
virtual clock object in the working memory, which you have to update with
certain mechanism to the current system time.
If you have your solution without DSL it should not be difficult to cast and
abstract this into a DSL.
Alexander Claus
2:02 a.m.
New subject: How to write the validation timestamp lessthancurrent date using drools
Thanks Alexander ...
I need clarification one more questions in my employee table
->employee_code can not be updated..... this is the condition
writing validation rule using dsl,dslr file.
Thanks and Regards,
Manya..
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Alexander Claus <styjdt(a)claus4joy.de>
wrote:
Manya,
please do not open two threads for almost the same question!
1.end_timestamp must be > start_timestamp this is the condition.
> 1.start_timestamp can not be =< Current Date this is the condition.
>
First, I think, "can not be <=" is the same as "must be >".
Drools is able to compare timestamps as primitive number types or as
java.util.Date's. So without DSL you can directly (no matter, what type the
timestamps are):
SomeClass(startTimestamp < endTimestamp, startTimestamp >
$currentTimestamp)
where $currentTimestamp is a variable binding done earlier in the rule.
Since clock support is introduced not until Drools 5, you have to insert a
virtual clock object in the working memory, which you have to update with
certain mechanism to the current system time.
If you have your solution without DSL it should not be difficult to cast
and abstract this into a DSL.
Alexander Claus
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
4:17 a.m.
New subject: How to write the validation timestamplessthancurrent date using drools
I need clarification one more questions in my employee table
->employee_code can not be updated..... this is the condition
writing validation rule using dsl,dslr file.
I must say, I don't know how to write the rule even without DSL... ;o)
Not with this information.
For me it looks like a kind of meta-information about the facts, but if not,
think, if "can not be updated" is a kind of property, which can be expressed
as constraints on some facts and their fields.
Alexander Claus
5808
days inactive
5808
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Alexander Claus -
manyasri m -
manyasri.m