Correct me if I'm wrong, but I understood that there would be a merge between jBPM and Drools Flow and that that merge would be jBPM v5. Dieter. On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Kenneth May <klcmay(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > You are correct, Drools Flow may not be the best choice of technology. > I could certainly write what is required in core Java very easily! > > However, there are a few reasons why this was my intended approach: > 1) A large degree of flexibility may be required in the future. I > like the concept of being able to change or apply new logic fairly > easily. > 2) Out of the box business activity monitorring is appealing > 3) I'm keen to explore BPM and rules technology in more depth > 4) The discussion in this (admittedly old) article suggested jBPM may > be a good fit: http://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossRulesjBPMSQLorJava. > My understanding is that Drools Flow is an alternative to jBPM and > from what I can tell has a far better integration with rules. > > That said: I'm not adverse to alternative approaches if what I'm > planning doesn't sound like a good fit. What I need to do is > essentially pretty simple: take a file and process it through several > steps (with some logic deciding which steps are relevant). > > Thanks for your help! > > Ken > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users