February 2014 - aerogear-dev - Jboss List Archives

by Corinne Krych

Hello Guys, To keep your documentation DRY, Karel suggested the usage of acsciidoc include in this ML thread [1]. We tried with Erik* some experiment, it's in this gist [2]. I think it's aneat feature and we could use it in different way: 1) reuse some cookbook documentation page (if in asciidoc format) 2) embed source code snippet in our documentation to make sure our doc is always up to date with latest code Just wanted to check with you if you like the idea bacause it will involve some documentation format changes (part of your web site revamp). Note: we could use code snippet include (option2) without option 1). wdyt? ++ Corinne [1] http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-Fwd-Website-restru... [2] https://gist.github.com/anonymous/dac8efdb7c90206acffe *asciisoc hero

12 years, 1 month

3
3
0 / 0

Offline Authentication and friends

by Bruno Oliveira

Good morning peeps, on the last week me and @passos spent most part of the time reading/testing/deleting and struggling with the best approach to provide offline authentication, encrypted cache and friends on AeroGear. This is our initial draft https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/pull/247 planned to be released with AG Security 1.4.0 if we survive to the global warming. Feedback is welcome. -- abstractj

12 years, 1 month

1
1
0 / 0

[UnifiedPush] Time for a release?

by Matthias Wessendorf

Hello, I'd like to release the next version of UPS (0.10.0), we covered a lot of items since our last release ([1]). However, there are some open PRs ([2] and [3]) around the user-management work that Sebi did, with help of Bruno. As we have been discussing on different threads (e.g. [4]), we started looking at Keycloak and it also offers the facility for user management as well. I'd like to get the Keycloak integration as the primary goal for the next release, beides fixes and other potential features (e.g. around security). That said, but IMO this kind makes the PRs around user-management redundant. Especially since in [2] we filed a bunch of new JIRAs to cover/fix issues and weak design etc. I'd really like to skip the user-mangement PR (see [2]). We might want to keep the branch - just in case, but I'd really like to see this not landing, especially as we are already looking towards keycloak integration. Any thoughts ? -Matthias [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH/fixforversion/12321876 [2] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/118 [3] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/123 [4] http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-Keycloak-on-AeroGe... -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

12 years, 1 month

4
3
0 / 0

Updating crypto dependency

by Christos Vasilakis

Hi team, aerogear-crypto latest version v0.2, requires iOS 7 and later and aerogear-ios has a dependency for. Currently, for aerogear-ios updating to iOS 7 is scheduled fro the 1.5 frame so it makes sense for the upcoming 1.4 release of the aerogear-ios library to leave the dependency for crypto in 0.1 Internally, the crypto functionality used by aerogear-ios (symmetric encryption) hasn’t been changed in the 0.2 which was focused more on asymmetric and digital signatures, so staying in 0.1 makes sense (for now). wdyth? Thanks, Christos

12 years, 1 month

2
3
0 / 0

Team meeting agenda for today

by Bruno Oliveira

http://oksoclap.com/p/UemilzzAVV -- abstractj

12 years, 1 month

2
1
0 / 0

DataSync or SyncPipe API proposal

by Corinne Krych

Hello Guys, Following discussion on ML thread [1], and JIRA discussion [2] (sorry guys I catched up the discussion late, I wasn’t watching the JIRa ticket so i didn’t get notifications) here is the 2 gists we have: 1. DataSync (JS naming) [3] 2. SyncPipe(ios naming) [4] I guess we should call them the same and agree on a name. I like to use ‘pipe’ in the naming just to recall it’s async and going through network. I found DataSync a too generic term which may lead to confusion. This is not the same object that will save data offline and trigger sync. Main differences are: in iOS one I defined a readAll method. Also for save/update I define a third callbacks ‘conflict’ which take 3 arguments . @summers do you have a gist for java API? thoughts? ++ Corinne [1] http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-sync-To-pipe-or-no... [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1408 [3] https://gist.github.com/lholmquist/81de9737b5c91367aa3c [4] https://gist.github.com/corinnekrych/8914290

12 years, 1 month

3
11
0 / 0

Sync Data model

by Daniel Bevenius

Hi, I've done some work on [1] in regards to coming up with a common sync data format for our clients, but I and messed it up [2]. Long story short is that I did not take into account some of client languages features. So here is a new suggestion that will hopefully work with all our client languages: public interface SyncObject<T, ID> { ID objectId(); String revision(); T content(); } What do people think about this? [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1406 [2] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/commit/5e81e5526b5850485eeb83a8f...

12 years, 1 month

3
6
0 / 0

Backend (jax-rs) Project

by Daniel Passos

Hi folks, I started a new backend project[1] using jax-rs. The idea of this project is provide some endpoints to use in the demos, integration tests and cookbooks. I have tried to fix and add new features to the old project[2], but the legacy is big and hard to fix I created a jira for it[3]. Feel free to add (and take) new sub tasks and send PRs [1] https://github.com/danielpassos/aerogear-integration-tests-server [2] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-jaxrs-demo [3] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1388 -- Daniel Passos

12 years, 1 month

2
2
0 / 0

AeroGear on StackOverflow

by Apostolos Emmanouilidis

Hi, I've created a tag and wiki excerpt for AeroGear on StackOverflow [1]. You can edit them and add more info about the project :) -- Tolis [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/tags/aerogear/info

12 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[iOS] small libs

by Corinne Krych

Hello iOS folks I’ve started looking at sync part, I’ve created a separate repo [1]. For now, this lib is dependant on iOS-core. does is worth having it separate for folks that what to use core without sync? Same question applies for encrypted store. Right no encrypted store are part of iOS-core. do we want to separate it for people who want core without encrypted store ? what about people who all it all, encrypted store+sync, we’ll have to manage correctly transitive dependencies. wdty? ++ Corinne [1] https://github.com/corinnekrych/aerogear-sync-ios

12 years, 2 months

4
6
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

aerogear-dev February 2014