6:44 a.m.
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Looks good!
+1 I like the dracula theme !
Apart for platform related code (JavaScript, Objective-C, Java), are there
any
plans to support platform related text?
E.g. pipes on Aerogear can be used within FragmentActivity, which is valid
for
Android only; Javadoc is not related to iOS, etc. That's basically a merge
of
our guides into a one per feature with information covering all the
platforms.
Which brings me to and idea of global platform switch. User/reader can
switch
platform once and all code snippets and platform related blocks are
automatically selected. Can also be session based and affect all pages user
visits.
+1 , that would be really cool. I came accross such a layout on
https://www.paymill.com/fr-fr/documentation/reference/api-reference/#docu...
,
check on the right, you have a tab where you can switch between different
languages, the snippet is updated.
There are also some online apps that does the job for you like apiary.ioand
https://www.mashape.com
Karel
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:37:28 +0100
Erik Jan de Wit <edewit(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What I get from this thread is that we like the colour section idea, but
we
> don’t want to re structure the entire site. So what we need to discuss
is how
> are we going to use these sections if we don’t restructure. What I like
about
> them is that it emphasises that our API’s are similar for all platforms
and
> that we only have one document explaining for instance what pipes are.
But
> the menu, doesn’t fit into this new colour scheme, so we need some
decisions
> about how we are going to move forward.
>
> Based on the work Corinne did with the introduction of sass I’ve had a
go at
> implementing a bit what Hylke proposed, have a look at my sass branch
> https://github.com/edewit/aerogear.org/tree/saas and the page I’ve
updated
>
http://localhost:4000/docs/guides/aerogear-android/AerogearAndroidPipes101/
> to be in section layout. Don’t look at the header and footer as I haven’t
> changed those.
>
> There are a couple of things that I don’t like about the current
> implementation, to enable the code blocks I’ve added some html into the
> asciidoc and some jquery magic in the layout. Maybe we could make this
better
> by chaining the rendering/backend or by introducing some sort of plugin
into
> asciidoc? Other then that, I’m sure Hylke sees a lot of things that are
still
> off, but it’s a start.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Cheers,
> Erik Jan
>
> p.s
> example picture https://www.dropbox.com/s/qtc4g0xwnyi0p41/Example.tiff
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev