Just to y'all know, that is what we are planning for android modules
aerogear-android-core (pipe, auth, autz)
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I believe there should be a POM depchain for users that are willing
aerogear-android and modular dependencies are for more experienced users.
Similarly to *Adding ShrinkWrap Resolvers to your project* at
I'm not sure how nicely that would play with Gradle though.
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 09:15:27 -0500
Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Earlier in development (pre passos) making the Android SDK into modules
> was not a concern (in fact it was an anti-concern).
> Now, however, we have a much more complete project and it is time to
> have that discussion.
> Right now we have two BIG questions:
> 1) Do we want to break out interfaces and implementation?
> If we do this then we could reuse a lot of code to make a aerogear-java
> as well.
> 2) How granular do we want our modules?
> IE If we break out push into aerogear-android-push would that include
> GCM, SimplePush, MQTT, etc in one package or would it look like
> aerogear-android-push-core, aerogear-android-push-mqtt etc.
aerogear-dev mailing list