On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:30 AM, tolis emmanouilidis <tolisemm(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
2014-08-28 8:50 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org>
>
> On our Face2Face meeting we briefly talked about this and I think the
> "accept header" solution was the one that had most fans. I think QMX added
> that it is better for migration. One thing we were not clear on (I think):
> What are HATEOS defined semantics?
>
What exactly do you mean by "HATEOAS defined semantics"; Is it in the
roadmap to use a HATEOAS implementation (maybe Hal) or Json hyper schema in
UPS rest?
not sure, someone added that to the meeting notes :)
Thanks,
Tolis
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf