On Oct 14, 2013, at 2:51 AM, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
So my suggestion was not to have something like
planet.jboss.org where we have duplicate
posts, but to have an aggregator to get blog posts from our personal blogs that contain a
special tag, 'aerogear' for instance, and have jekyll download that rss.xml file
then we can have a page somewhere on the
aerogear.org site, that is the same style as the
rest of the site, with just links and maybe a short intro to the actual blog. That way
people searching for things about aerogear don't have to know all our personal names
and blog addresses and it doesn't kill SEO it supports it as our blogs will even
ranked higher in google. The only issue with this approach is that we don't update the
site that often, but that is also something we could live with.
This was my thinking as well but also perhaps looking into a way to use JS to update the
article list from the feed instead of needing a full re-deply for updates. I believe
Awestruct has some similar features for blogs and tweets.
Imo at least something to look into. Erik - could you update the jira with some of this
info and/or link to the thread so we can capture these ideas?
On 11 Oct,2013, at 17:37 , Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 04:52:52PM +0200, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
>>
>> Am 11.10.2013 um 16:49 schrieb Jay Balunas:
>>>> Duplicated content hurts SEO, that's why I've been avoiding
it...
>>>
>>> Do you know the degree of impact here, or links for more details for
>>> us to review. I did some quick searches and read some of them, but
>>> a lot seemed mixed, some good, some bad.
>>
>> SEO is one part of the game. The other is the visibility on
jboss.org
>> and also the feeds from it that people may have already subscribed to.
>
> AFAIK, our blogs are on
planet.jboss.org (at least my posts tagged with
> 'aerogear' appear there :P)
>
> Either way, our site is pretty different from
jboss.org (ours is 100%
> static html), and I don't think it'll be healthy to pull this feeds on
> the client side. And this feels a little bit old too - hence why I'm
> trying to avoid the 'aggregator'.
>
> --
> qmx
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev