will this replace the java client [1] we currently have? Or will can we
extend it?
[1]
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
What's new in WebPush Java Client:
- Updated to the latest aerogear-parent
- Updated Jetty http2-client to the latest version
- Clean up pom.xml
- Subscription and PushMessage objects became to be Serializable
- Refactoring and little improvements
- Added documentation to all public classes and methods - the most
valuable improvement :)
For more information, see [1].
Tests will be coming soon...
[1]
https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy/aerogear-webpush-java-client/commits/ma...
Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
--
Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <
https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <
https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <
idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've just implemented a lightweight java client for receiving push
> messages from AeroGear WebPush Server [1]. It is easy to use and fully
> async!
>
> A few words about decision to use Jetty as a HTTP/2 client:
>
> Currently there are only 3 Java libraries, which implement client side of
> HTTP/2 protocol [2]: Netty, Jetty and OkHttp. I tried all of them:
>
> - First of all I tried to use OkHttp. This is a lightweight http
> client for Android and other Java apps. But currently this library supports
> HTTP/2 protocol only via old HTTP/1.1 API. It works well for simple
> request-response, but its client API does not allow to use HTTP/2 features,
> like Server Push Frames. I looked at GRPC [3], because Googlers use OkHttp
> for HTTP/2 transport. But they don't use public API, they use only inner
> classes to handle frames and built their own logic atop this classes. It
> would be too complicated for our purposes.
> - Secondary, I tried to refactor our WebPush console to a client
> library. But this way is complicated too. netty-codec-http2 does not
> provide a client API, it is only codec, low level protocol implementation.
> - Now I use jetty-http2-client. It is easy to configure and use, fast
> and async. Jetty provides a user friendly API to handle HTTP/2 streams and
> get PUSH_PROMISE frames.
>
> For more information, look at my commit history.
> In the future, if there will be more lightweight alternatives than Jetty
> (for example, new version of OkHttp or Java 9 API), I will rewrite the
> transport layer of my library.
>
> Here is an example, how to use my library [4].
>
> [1]
https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy/aerogear-webpush-java-client
> [2]
https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/wiki/Implementations
> [3]
https://github.com/grpc/grpc-java/tree/master/okhttp
> [4]
>
https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy/aerogear-webpush-java-client/blob/maste...
>
> Best regards,
> Idel Pivnitskiy
> --
> E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com
> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <
https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <
https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev