On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 06:08:21AM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> However not sure if this name implies the client is also responsible to
> create PushApplications/Variants.
> But it is really just a java version of a "sender"
What is a sender? I mean, it lacks context ;)
Ok, but not sure how to improve that, without a mouthful :-)
I guess we can go with "unified-push-java-client", that's just fine for me.
If this is only a sender, the nodejs client and this should be
even at repository level, right?
aerogear-dev mailing list