On 01 Dec 2014, at 15:12, Christos Vasilakis
<cvasilak(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 1, 2014, at 3:58 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Guys
>
> Since AGIOS-255 (Basic/Digest auth for aerogear-ios-http) is under review and will be
merged soon, one question that pops up is: shall we use ag-ios-http lib to support push
registration in Swift lib (aerogear-ios-push). So far we’ve been using plain NSURLSession
to do it as it wasn’t yet ready on http lib.
>
> I think there are two sides of it:
> - eat your own dog food
> - does it really make sense - looking at the "remove 2 lines, but will add
dependency"..... sounds like does not really make sense :)
>
> I am fine in keeping it as it is.
+1 the lesser dependencies the better, in cases where it makes sense like here I guess.
+1
I lean toward the same approach so far basic auth is not much work to deal with foundation
layer.
-
Christos
>
> Thanks for the insights!
>
> -M
>
>
>
> Doing so will remove 2 lines of boiler plate code but will add a dependency (although
internal to aerogear). As either ways seem fine for me, I’d like to have your views on
it.
>
> ++
> Corinne
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev