Re: [esb-dev] remove bus/provider requirement
You mean it annoys you ;)? You still have to define it the jms provider
info. Does it really matter where it is? Maybe I'm not understanding
this correctly, but I don't see why this would be annoying. It's reduces
the amount of configuration bugs. Providing a channel is different then
listening to it. We can sit down next week and add a jca-listener to the
xsd and I'll add a mapper for it, easy stuff.
--Kurt
Bill Burke wrote:
Its simple. If you are only declaring one listener for one
provider,
then there really is no need to describe a provider. Its extra syntax
sugar that just annoys the user.
Mark Little wrote:
> Bill, could you provide an example of what you want to accomplish (a
> before and after)? It may help to remove any confusion.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark.
>
>
> On 4 May 2007, at 22:43, Bill Burke wrote:
>
>> I would like to remove the bus/provider requirement that
>> listeners/gateways have.
>>
>> The move is basically around cutting the amount of syntax sugar that
>> is required when writing a gateway or a listener. My bet is that in
>> a majority of cases, the provider/bus syntax/metadata is not
>> reusable. Why require the extra metadata?
>>
>> This is even more so when plugging in JCA since JCA in/out is
>> configured separately, or in the case of JMS, might not even have an
>> outbound configuration.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> --
>> Bill Burke
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat Inc.
>> _______________________________________________
>> esb-dev mailing list
>> esb-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:esb-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/esb-dev
>
> ----
>
> Mark Little
> mlittle(a)redhat.com <mailto:mlittle@redhat.com>
>
> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
> Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in UK
> and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 Directors: Michael
> Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David Owens (Ireland)
>
>
>
>