Hi Willi,
My preference would be to limit the first round to the actual javax.money
stuff.
We are running a survey currently at
http://beanvalidation.org/news/2016/09/15/which-constraints-to-add/ asking
whether to add @Negative/@Positive. Based on that we need to decide whether
to add them to the spec, or - if not - to HV. On the others I'm not so
sure, they don't seem to add too much IMHO.
Cheers,
--Gunnar
2016-09-29 14:43 GMT+02:00 Willi Schönborn <w.schoenborn(a)gmail.com>:
Hi,
I'm currently preparing a pull request to contribute Java Money related
validators to HV:
https://github.com/zalando/money-validation
The main part are custom validators to add support for MonetaryAmount to
the following constraints:
- DecimalMax
- DecimalMin
- Max
- Min
As an addition we defined the following custom constraints:
- Negative
- NegativeOrZero
- Positive
- PositiveOrZero
- Zero
Their names are closely aligned to methods in MonetaryAmount, but they are
in fact built solely on top of the standard constraints DecimalMax and
DecimalMin. So in theory somebody can use those with int, longs,
BigDecimals, BigInteger, CharSequence, ... You get the idea.
My question now is, are you guys interested in those custom constraints as
well or should I limit my pull request to the validators for
MonetaryAmount?
Best,
Willi
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev