10:27 a.m.
Hi,
I was checking out HHH-5721, but it contains a patch that is licensed under GPL-v3.
I guess this is incompatible with Hibernate's license, or am I mistaken here?
Regards,
Erik-Berndt Scheper
Disclaimer:
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the
property of Sogeti Nederland B.V. or its Group members. It is intended only for the person
to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to
read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part
thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete all copies of this message.
10:54 a.m.
Yes, GPL-3 doesn't mix well with LGPL.
/max
On Nov 24, 2010, at 17:27, Scheper, Erik-Berndt wrote:
Hi,
I was checking out HHH-5721, but it contains a patch that is licensed under GPL-v3.
I guess this is incompatible with Hibernate's license, or am I mistaken here?
Regards,
Erik-Berndt Scheper
Disclaimer:
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the
property of Sogeti Nederland B.V. or its Group members. It is intended only for the person
to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to
read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part
thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete all copies of this message.
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
1:15 p.m.
Patch contributors must agree to allow licensing of the contribution under
LGPL. If the patch is small enough (few lines) explicit allowence on their
part is not needed as we can implicitily apply their patch under LGPL. For
larger changesets we should be getting explicit approval from them. Again,
depending on the size of the contribution this can either be an
acknowledgement by them on the JIRA issue or a signed CLA
On Wednesday, November 24, 2010, at 10:54 am, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
Yes, GPL-3 doesn't mix well with LGPL.
/max
On Nov 24, 2010, at 17:27, Scheper, Erik-Berndt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was checking out HHH-5721, but it contains a patch that is licensed
> under GPL-v3.
>
> I guess this is incompatible with Hibernate's license, or am I mistaken
> here?
>
> Regards,
> Erik-Berndt Scheper
>
> Disclaimer:
> This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
> and is the property of Sogeti Nederland B.V. or its Group members. It is
> intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the
> intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy,
> disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you
> receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and
> delete all copies of this message.
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
---
Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org>
http://hibernate.org
5145
days inactive
5145
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Max Rydahl Andersen -
Scheper, Erik-Berndt -
Steve Ebersole