Cool, thanks for following up.
So then I'd vote we rename the hibernate-core respository to
hibernate-orm. I actually think that hibernate-core as a module and
artifact name is ok. Additionally I'd say we do that just before
branching 4.0 (just after 4.0.1 release)
Thoughts?
On Tue 03 Jan 2012 09:02:44 AM CST, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
To answer the last question, rename of a github repo is fine. I am
not sure forks are carried over but they can easily be remade.
The local repo on the developer machine simply need to remove the old remote, add the new
one and do a fetch.
That's not disruptive.
Emmanuel
On 3 janv. 2012, at 15:56, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> [08:56]<jbott> Meeting ended Tue Jan 3 14:55:46 2012 UTC. Information
> about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
> [08:56]<jbott> Minutes:
>
http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/hibernate-dev/2012/...
> [08:56]<jbott> Minutes (text):
>
http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/hibernate-dev/2012/...
> [08:56]<jbott> Log:
>
http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/hibernate-dev/2012/...
>
> --
> steve(a)hibernate.org
>
http://hibernate.org
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
--
steve(a)hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org