Most likely it is the cycle between hibernate-core and
hibernate-orm-modules. Let me research a bit...
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:34 PM andrea boriero <andrea(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
rebased my old PR and it stops working, the "publishing is not
yet able to
resolve a dependency on a project with multiple different publications"
exception is back :(
I'm investigating to understand what change reintroduced this issue.
On 31 January 2017 at 09:57, andrea boriero <andrea(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
after thinking a bit on +1 for Steve proposal
On 31 January 2017 at 08:09, Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
Agreed, it'd be the right time if we wanted to change this.
I vote for 1 in case we do it.
In ORM it's enough for many use cases to just add that core module,
hence I like the more concise "hibernate-orm" id (similar to
"hibernate-validator"). It's a bit different for OGM and HSEARCH where
one needs core and typically another module with the NoSQL/indexing
backend (hence I like "hibernate-ogm-core" there).
2017-01-30 17:31 GMT+01:00 Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org>:
> Relatedly, I have been thinking whether we want to rename the ORM
artifacts
> as well since this is the best time if we wanted to do that.
>
> So we know we will change the groupId to `org.hibernate.orm`.
>
> I was thinking we might want to also either:
>
> 1. rename `hibernate-core` as `hibernate-orm`
> 2. rename all the artifacts following the pattern
`hibernate-orm-${1}`,
> e.g. `hibernate-orm-core`, `hibernate-orm-osgi`, etc.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:26 AM Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org>
wrote:
>
>> Well let's investigate what this consistency means across projects
first.
>> As Sanne mentions, if it makes it building ORM more difficult then I'd
be
>> -1 it too. But I promise to take a peek when I get back from PTO in a
few
>> days. Or maybe Andrea can in the next few days as he already has
worked on
>> the changes to release relocation artifacts for ORM; I just do not know
>> when he is coming back from PTO. Either way we will have looked at it
for
>> ORM by the end of week.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 7:11 AM Guillaume Smet <
guillaume.smet(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)hibernate.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Different projects have different needs. Consistency is nice, and
>> > certainly makes it easier to find oneself comfortably "at home"
when
>> > jumping from one project to another, but it also is inconvenient to do
>> > things "for consistency" when one has different requirements.
>> >
>>
>> I don't think we would have different requirements regarding the
relocation
>> artifacts.
>>
>> But if you see any issue with the approach we chose for HV, interesting
in
>> hearing them so that we can have the same approach for the different
NoORM
>> project.
>>
>> --
>> Guillaume
>> _______________________________________________
>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev