Hi,
> Should the ignore-annotation flag be a <bean/> level
attribute only
> or should a user be able to define it at the field/method/class level?
I think bean level annotation is sufficient. I am sure that some people
can come up with some sort of use case field and method level, but it just
adds unnecessay complexity. Bean level seems to be most intuative
> We could enhance this in two ways:
> - provide type-safe support for built-in validations:
> <not-null/>,
> <min>
> <value>3</value>
> <message>blah</message>
> </min>
> etc
> - allow custom constraints support in a type-safe way:
Not sure. I like one consistent way of expresssing constraints. I don't
think
it would be so important to have the xml 'typesafe'. Maybe you could send
the
actual xsd files. It would be easier if I could load the xsd into a xml
editor
and try some of the examples.
BTW, what does <stop-inhertiance/> do?
--Hardy