Make sure you write a client of this API, I suspect Class<?>... parameterTypes might
not be what you want.
On 8 avr. 2011, at 13:41, Kevin Pollet wrote:
On vendredi 8 avril 2011 at 13:13, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I also like
https://gist.github.com/903302#file_1_method_configuration.java
> best. As we already decided to accept some breaking changes around
> ConstraintDef, I also think it's better to do other breaking changes
> now instead of later.
>
> Just one remark: we need a way to clearly identify overloaded methods.
> In addition to ConstraintDef#method(String name) from the proposal
> there should be another method like ConstraintDef#method(String name,
> Class<?>... parameterTypes).
>
> The first could be used if only one method with a given name exists,
> the latter if several overloaded methods with the same name exist.
>
> Gunnar
Good catch, I haven't seen this case.
My thinking is that only ConstraintDef#method(String name, Class<?>...
parameterTypes) would suffice (parameterTypes is a varargs and can be empty).
--Kevin