Hi Marc,
thanks for your feedback. Answers inline
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:08:43 +0100, Marc Schipperheyn
<m.schipperheyn(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I have a lot of experience with Bobo Browse. The code is well
maintained
and performs well.
The last release was over a year back and personally I find the docs very
sparse. I also
think there is a lot of complexity in bob browse which is not needed for
simple faceting.
Either way, I don't think it would be a good idea to expose the bobo
browse facet API directly
in Search. This would bind us to bobo browse for now apparent reason. If
we come up with with
a working facet API for Search we can always change the implementation
later or make it
configurable.
I don't have time to download and implement code examples, but if
you
have working examples up somewhere, I'd be happy to take a look.
There are code examples in SimpleFacetingTest.java and
RangeFacetingTest.java in this
package
https://github.com/hferentschik/hibernate-search/tree/3a9877e2bbc47a8bd6e...
If you get hold of
https://github.com/hferentschik/hibernate-search/tree/HSEARCH-667 you can
always run
these examples by running 'mvn clean test'
--Hardy