On 5 Jan 2014, at 18:40, Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
Historically annotation binding within Hibernate made a huge
assumption
that AccessType and PropertyAccessor were the same thing. They aren't
necessarily. AccessType is simply meant to dictate where to look for
annotations relating to "persistent attributes". PropertyAccessor is
Hibernate's way of accessing property values (getting/setting) at runtime.
Granted, AccessType *by default* should indicate the PropertyAccessor to
use. I am not arguing that. I am just suggesting that we should keep both
as distinct values. At the moment we collapse them into a single String
(we dump AccessType and keep "PropertyAccessor name").
The trouble is that later on we sometimes need to know the AccessType, at
which point we are forced to make a guess by interpreting the
PropertyAccessor in use and hoping that a custom PropertyAccessor was not
supplied.
I don’t know where it is exactly where you need the distinction, but if you do,
I also think they should be kept separated. Also having distinct concepts for this maybe
makes concepts also a bit clearer.
+1 from me
—Hardy