On Jun 5, 2012, at 5:51 PM, John Verhaeg wrote:
On Jun 5, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> Out of curiosity, why 2 merges?
I was just thinking it might help reduce the number of potential conflicts during the
first merge. If not, then one is fine in my mind.
Same here. Since you mentioned that the test directories have already partly diverged I
thought it would be easier to do things step by step.
Personally I think this is the more natural approach anyways. If we sort out a merge now
the collapsing of the test directories should be straight
forward then.
I guess one could run some quick experiments to see how bad things are. Personally I would
start my attempts w/ a merge first :-)
--Hardy