Actually it is not fixed yet :) Let me think about it.
On Thu 19 Jan 2012 08:08:56 PM CST, Steve Ebersole wrote:
I think HHH-6855 should be. HHH-6854 is just a test fix, I'd say
its
not important for backport.
I don't think there is actually any code changes for HHH-4358. I may
have left that fix version there by mistake.
On Thu 19 Jan 2012 04:05:46 PM CST, Gail Badner wrote:
> I've created new issues for backporting fixes for 3.6.10.
>
> Please take a look at:
>
https://hibernate.onjira.com/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mo...
>
>
> I'm not planning to backport dialect-related issues, although I could
> be talked into it.
>
> Steve, should HHH-6855/HHH-6854 and/or HHH-4358 also be backported?
>
> Adam, are there any Envers issues that should be backported for
> 3.6.10? If so, please create new issues for them and assign as
> appropriate.
>
> Feedback?
>
> Thanks,
> Gail
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev