On 24 September 2013 14:56, Hardy Ferentschik <hardy(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
On 24 Jan 2013, at 3:16 PM, Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> On 24 September 2013 13:46, Hardy Ferentschik <hardy(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
>> Cool, we seem to agree on almost everything now :-)
>
> +1 it's hard to get convergence when the thread explodes exponentially
> on several different subjects but it seems it was worth it.
> thanks for the huge energy and ideas :-)
I agree. It was quite some effort, but it was worth it.
>>>> 5) rename 'getShardIdentifier' to
'getShardIdentifierForAddition'
>>>
>>> Is that needed? I thought that by removing the conflicting method
>>> there would be no further need to clarify the method. I'd propose to
>>> keep the method name as is, we still have the javadocs asset to
>>> clarify how this is all being used for the apprehensive user.
>>
>> Not necessarily. Just thought it is more symmetric with
getShardIdentifierForQuery.
>> The name implies to a certain degree where the method is used. I can go
>> either way on this one.
>
> Let's keep the current name. I'm pretty sure we won't use it just for
> additions (updates for one),
> as it really is *the* method defining the relationship function
> Document -> shard.
ok
> The name of getShardIdentifierForQuery is exceptional because it
> really is geared for Query,
> providing filtering capabilities.
hmm
come on, the "agreement progress bar" got stuck at 99,97% ??
:-D
--Hardy