On 11 Jan 2013, at 19:25, Scott Marlow <smarlow(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 12/11/2013 11:44 AM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Ales,
>
> Can you confirm that some static method is involved here (which was the
> case for HV-818)? I can't see one on your Email class but maybe there is
> one on AbstractEntity?
>
> If so, I think releasing a 5.0.2.Final would make sense, containing the
> following three issues:
>
> * HV-818 (this issue)
> * HV-838 (the class loader leak)
> * HV-835 (updating to ClassMate 1.0)
>
> The last one is not strictly required as the changes from 0.8 to 1.0 are
> basically doc fixes, still I'd prefer to have HV use the same version as
> WF does since recently.
>
> Scott, do you know when the cut-off is for delivering stuff into WF CR1?
The cut-off is past but I still see changes being added to WF 8 (there
are a few TCK failures to tackle still). So, I think we should try to
get 5.0.2 into WF 8.
Well, we need to first cut a 5.0.2 release and before we do I would like to make sure
we have an actual solution for the ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException.
—Hardy