I'll try avoiding a flame war here... especially as I'm a Terracotta
employee and working on Ehcache.
That being said, the FAQ says:
"I just built both EHCache (1.2-beta4) and JCS (1.2.7.0) from head, (...)",
where 1.3.0 was released over 7 years ago, I guess "just" has relative
semantics here.
Latest stable JCS release is 5 years old now too, so whether you still
manage to find the Ehcache perf results, or are reading the ones on the JCS
website... there are, how would I best put it, ... utterly out of date.
On a side note, if the 2.0 release will be 107 compliant, I have a JSR-107
caching provider more or less done (missing a couple of things for the
read-write strategy around collections), but I'd love to test with that too
then (not necessarily perf only though here).
Anyways, random biased thoughts :)
Alex
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Petar,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Petar Tahchiev <paranoiabla(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> I would really like to give apache commons jcs a spin (the FAQ says
> performancewise it's faster than EHCache)
I don't know JCS but I find it funny they criticize the fact that
Ehcache published an old benchmark and that they still have a very old
one in their FAQ.
It might be interesting to have more recent performance information
comparing the latest versions of both before deciding if it's really
worth it.
--
Guillaume
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
--
Alex Snaps <alex.snaps(a)gmail.com>
Principal Software Engineer - Terracotta
http://twitter.com/alexsnaps
http://about.me/alexsnaps
http://www.devoxx4kids.org/quebec/