JDBC 4 is JDK 1.6, correct.
Because not all deployment environments support jdk 1.6 nor do all jdbc
drivers support jdbc 4
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 19:07 +0200, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
Actually naive question.
JDBC 4 is JDK 6 right. Since JDK 5 is EOLed at the end of this month,
Why don't we just stop JDBC 3 support altogether?
On 22 sept. 09, at 18:19, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> from how I understand Maven, swallow it and go for 2.
>
> On 21 sept. 09, at 20:53, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
>>
http://in.relation.to/12371.lace
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org>
>>
Hibernate.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev