Thanks Max for validating I am not going insane... at least in regards to
this :)
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On 23 Jan 2015, at 14:18, Steve Ebersole wrote:
[1] - I vaguely recall seeing that certain databases allow different
> length
> constraints for different types of identifiers (table name, versus column
> name, versus constrain name, ...). Can anyone confirm that?
>
I remember db2 have this fun.
http://bytes.com/topic/db2/answers/183320-maximum-length-
table-names-colums-etc
I believe Oracle has too but couldn't find evidence for it.
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen