2014-07-28 11:48 GMT+02:00 Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)hibernate.org>:
We'd also love to support some features (especially the new user
types
such as Date/Time) in Hibernate Search.
Ah, right. I've heard requests about the 310 date/time types as well.
I don't think we should require Java8 for all users though, so I'd
like this to be an independent module.. troublesome with Maven though,
so this wasn't done yet.
Yes, it should definitely be optional.
I think it depends on the specific case how easy or hard this will be to
achieve. If it's something rather isolated such as a specific user type
it's easy, but in other cases it's more painful (e.g. marking annotation
types as repeatable cannot really be done in a backwards-compatible manner,
so it needs effectively two variants of such an annotation).
--Sanne
On 28 July 2014 07:36, Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Java 8 introduced a new type Optional which may be used to represent
> objects which may be set or not set:
>
> private Optional<String> name;
>
> Hibernate Validator will allow to validate properties of this type in the
> next release. Now someone brought up the question whether the same is
> planned for ORM, so one can use Optional in entity properties.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Gunnar
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev