10:15 a.m.
Hi,
Given that we are moving to Search 5 and we made some recent adjustments, I am wondering
whether it would
not be time to remove the experimental status of the spatial Api now? Thoughts?
—Hardy
2:58 a.m.
Hi Hardy,
I would have liked to have more user feedbacks before that.
But as the use case is not that frequent ...
Have some of the Hibernate Search team members some time to test it ?
Do you have any feedback ?
Niko
2013/12/13 Hardy Ferentschik <hardy(a)hibernate.org>:
Hi,
Given that we are moving to Search 5 and we made some recent adjustments, I am wondering
whether it would
not be time to remove the experimental status of the spatial Api now? Thoughts?
—Hardy
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
6:55 a.m.
While I hope the API won't need any change, the implementation will be
different: for one some Lucene APIs changed which affect it
significantly, and also Lucene 4 provides some of this functionality
already.
We'll be in a better position to decide on this after we know the
actual difference?
On 14 December 2013 08:58, Nicolas Helleringer
<nicolas.helleringer(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Hardy,
I would have liked to have more user feedbacks before that.
But as the use case is not that frequent ...
Have some of the Hibernate Search team members some time to test it ?
Do you have any feedback ?
Niko
2013/12/13 Hardy Ferentschik <hardy(a)hibernate.org>:
> Hi,
>
> Given that we are moving to Search 5 and we made some recent adjustments, I am
wondering whether it would
> not be time to remove the experimental status of the spatial Api now? Thoughts?
>
> —Hardy
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
12:38 p.m.
Sent from my iPad
On 14 dec 2013, at 13:55, Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
While I hope the API won't need any change, the implementation
will be
different: for one some Lucene APIs changed which affect it
significantly, and also Lucene 4 provides some of this functionality
already.
We'll be in a better position to decide on this after we know the
actual difference?
Fair enough. Let's see how Search 5 goes. Something to keep in mind though.
--hardy
1:32 a.m.
When I used it, I was mostly fine with it. I had only a few remarks:
- we should add the support for miles. Only having kilometers was in
retrospect wrong.
- spatial as a name is a bit fuzzy, should we change it? I tend to use
geolocation maybe geoquery when I try to explain the notion.
- in the DSL should we rename onCoordinates with onCoordinatesField or
even onSpatialField?
The intend would be a bit clearer.
- I frequently makes the mistake of writing my spatial query without
setting up the index. We might want to try and make that error message
as descriptove as possible.
- Lucene 4 comes with the notion of spatial queries supporting shapes.
We should experiment with the DSL to see if that notion can be safely
added. (I think it does at least on the DSL side).
Emmanuel
On Fri 2013-12-13 17:15, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
Hi,
Given that we are moving to Search 5 and we made some recent adjustments, I am wondering
whether it would
not be time to remove the experimental status of the spatial Api now? Thoughts?
—Hardy
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
5:36 a.m.
On 16 Jan 2013, at 08:32, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
- spatial as a name is a bit fuzzy, should we change it? I tend to
use
geolocation maybe geoquery when I try to explain the notion.
not sure. IMO spatial is the right term. I find relocation less appealing, but better than
geoquery which
gets a -1
- in the DSL should we rename onCoordinates with onCoordinatesField
or
even onSpatialField?
+1 for on spatialField
- I frequently makes the mistake of writing my spatial query without
setting up the index. We might want to try and make that error message
as descriptove as possible.
+1
- Lucene 4 comes with the notion of spatial queries supporting
shapes.
We should experiment with the DSL to see if that notion can be safely
added. (I think it does at least on the DSL side).
+1
—hardy
6:13 a.m.
2013/12/19 Hardy Ferentschik <hardy(a)hibernate.org>
On 16 Jan 2013, at 08:32, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> - spatial as a name is a bit fuzzy, should we change it? I tend to use
> geolocation maybe geoquery when I try to explain the notion.
not sure. IMO spatial is the right term. I find relocation less appealing,
but better than geoquery which
gets a -1
How about "geospatial"? It seems to be an established term, e.g. in
"geospatial search".
> - in the DSL should we rename onCoordinates with onCoordinatesField or
> even onSpatialField?
+1 for on spatialField
> - I frequently makes the mistake of writing my spatial query without
> setting up the index. We might want to try and make that error message
> as descriptove as possible.
+1
> - Lucene 4 comes with the notion of spatial queries supporting shapes.
> We should experiment with the DSL to see if that notion can be safely
> added. (I think it does at least on the DSL side).
+1
—hardy
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
6:27 a.m.
On 19 Jan 2013, at 13:13, Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
2013/12/19 Hardy Ferentschik <hardy(a)hibernate.org>
On 16 Jan 2013, at 08:32, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> - spatial as a name is a bit fuzzy, should we change it? I tend to use
> geolocation maybe geoquery when I try to explain the notion.
not sure. IMO spatial is the right term. I find relocation less appealing, but better
than geoquery which
gets a -1
How about "geospatial"? It seems to be an established term, e.g. in
"geospatial search”.
sure geospatial works as well.
—Hardy
9:21 a.m.
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HSEARCH-1469
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HSEARCH-1470
On Thu 2013-12-19 12:36, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
On 16 Jan 2013, at 08:32, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> - spatial as a name is a bit fuzzy, should we change it? I tend to use
> geolocation maybe geoquery when I try to explain the notion.
not sure. IMO spatial is the right term. I find relocation less appealing, but better
than geoquery which
gets a -1
> - in the DSL should we rename onCoordinates with onCoordinatesField or
> even onSpatialField?
+1 for on spatialField
> - I frequently makes the mistake of writing my spatial query without
> setting up the index. We might want to try and make that error message
> as descriptove as possible.
+1
> - Lucene 4 comes with the notion of spatial queries supporting shapes.
> We should experiment with the DSL to see if that notion can be safely
> added. (I think it does at least on the DSL side).
+1
—hardy
10:36 a.m.
nice, thanks all. Optimistically labelled these issues as 5.0
Also, there are other issues open already which suggested API
improvements: so while indeed the API isn't new anymore, we haven't
properly incorporated all feedback.
Looks like we all agree it stays experimental for now.
On 19 December 2013 15:21, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HSEARCH-1469
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HSEARCH-1470
On Thu 2013-12-19 12:36, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> On 16 Jan 2013, at 08:32, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
>
> > - spatial as a name is a bit fuzzy, should we change it? I tend to use
> > geolocation maybe geoquery when I try to explain the notion.
>
> not sure. IMO spatial is the right term. I find relocation less appealing, but better
than geoquery which
> gets a -1
>
> > - in the DSL should we rename onCoordinates with onCoordinatesField or
> > even onSpatialField?
>
> +1 for on spatialField
>
> > - I frequently makes the mistake of writing my spatial query without
> > setting up the index. We might want to try and make that error message
> > as descriptove as possible.
>
> +1
>
> > - Lucene 4 comes with the notion of spatial queries supporting shapes.
> > We should experiment with the DSL to see if that notion can be safely
> > added. (I think it does at least on the DSL side).
>
> +1
>
> —hardy
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
4042
days inactive
4048
days old
9 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Emmanuel Bernard -
Gunnar Morling -
Hardy Ferentschik -
Nicolas Helleringer -
Sanne Grinovero