Atm. it's not handled consistently between dialects; e.g.
hibernate-ogm-mongodb already has a "type" package as you suggest.
+1 for making it consistent and having separate packages as you propose.
--Gunnar
2014-05-14 16:12 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>:
 adding the mailing list back.
 Other datastores use the same approach as you so we need to eb
 consistent
 On Wed 2014-05-14 11:22, Davide D'Alto wrote:
 > Neo4jSequenceGenerator and Neo4jTypeConverter were the result of some
 code
 > that I've extracted from the dialect.
 > Initially I didn't expect them to be used somewhere else outside the
 > dialect.
 >
 > Sounds good to me to move them to a separate package.
 >
 >
 > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Emmanuel Bernard <
 emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>wrote:
 >
 > > It does not make a huge difference as these are in impl packages but I
 > > wonder if somebody has a specific reasoning for putting types
 > > (converters) and sequence generators inside the dialect package?
 > >
 > > Granted they are wired in the dialect but in practice they are used by
 > > the code base at large. I think naturally I would ahve put them under
 > >
 > >     o.h.o.datastore.somenosql.type / generator or idgenerator
 > > _______________________________________________
 > > hibernate-dev mailing list
 > > hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
 > > 
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
 > >
 _______________________________________________
 hibernate-dev mailing list
 hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
 
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev