the fix re-introduces the old behaviour (pre 5.0), the change in 5.0 and
5.1 was an oversight.
On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 23:45, Gail Badner <gbadner(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I was looking into backporting HHH-13076 for 5.3.8.
Looking at the fix , I see that starting a JDBC transaction that is
already started will fail, even
AFAICT, this didn't happen in 5.1. Was there a reason in particular why
this was done?