I only have so many hours in the day :)
Let's get comparable behavior working first and then attack more complex
(although we all agree probably worthwhile in this case) after.
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:37 AM Christian Beikov <christian.beikov(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
May I ask what happened to the idea of not rendering through the
literals at all and just "inject" them into the result tuple? We could
even go as far as allowing expressions on constant values to be
evaluated in memory instead of sending that to the DB.
Other than that, the settings seem ok, but how does that affect
subqueries? The same way? Or are subqueries the exception?
Regards,
Christian
Am 31.12.2016 um 15:25 schrieb Steve Ebersole:
> Currently in 6.0 I have code in place to render query literals as
> PreparedStatement parameters, but only outside the SELECT clause. Many
DBs
> require special handling for parameters defined in the SELECT clause
> general requiring to wrap in cast functions calls.
>
> I think it may be beneficial to allow the user to control this via a
> setting. Specifically a multi-valued (enum) value with the following
> possibility set:
>
> 1. NEVER
> 2. ALWAYS
> 3. OUTSIDE_SELECT
>
> First, does anyone have an issue with this proposal? Secondly does
anyone
> see other concerns that should be take into account?
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev