November 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Upgrading Jackrabbit to 1.1 on Portal 2.6?

by sohil.shah＠jboss.com

I haven't found any issues with it. I did upgrade it when I was working on getting the full blown clustering to work with jackrabbit internal cache. When that didn't work out and we stuck with the HA-Singleton approach, we scrapped the plans to upgrade it in 2.4. But looking at their Release notes, it wont break our CMS and it didn't when I used it View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990151#3990151 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990151

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: vfs* based URLs

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Are you adding the JarFile abstraction or not? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990143#3990143 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990143

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: vfs* based URLs

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

I personally don't like the idea of rewriting and maintaining stuff that already exists, tested and used by millions of people within the JDK. I think if we move to VFS based ClassLoaders a lot of the problems I saw at least will become moot. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990141#3990141 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990141

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Where are we at with the metadata unification?

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Where are we at with the metadata unification? The ejb3 related layers are still using a model separate from org.jboss.metadata, and we need a strategy for unification that works under both jboss5/4.2. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990139#3990139 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990139

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Recent changes to VFS jar processing

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I fixed the failing test. It was inconsistent resolution of a file timestamp vs a jar entry timestamp on win32. The win32 timestamp was not using millisecond resolution so I dropped that portion of the check. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990135#3990135 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990135

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: vfs* based URLs

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

My concern with this is that we are still subject to the behavior of the underlying protocol handler and its implementation details. I'm still trying to drill into the current readBytes error coming from the FileInputStream native method on win32 and not having access to the actual error is tedious. The same type of issue exists for JarFile where a lot of detail is in native methods. The first thing we need is a java.util.jar.JarFile abstraction so we can replace its usage. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990133#3990133 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990133

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: ws-eventing: event notification failure

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

cool, thanks. i will take care that it get's included in 1.0.5. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990129#3990129 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990129

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Upgrading Jackrabbit to 1.1 on Portal 2.6?

by roy.russo＠jboss.com

Several people have asked me privately, if we intend to upgrade portal cms to jackrabbit 1.1. I would like to start this thread and hear the pros and cons, and whether it is possible, given our timelime. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990128#3990128 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990128

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: ws-eventing: event notification failure

by palin

Hi Heiko, "heiko.braun(a)jboss.com" wrote : a) notification failures: sure, it sound reasonable to track them through the SubscriptionManager. Resending (means queuing) would require additonal constraints (expiration policy, softening, etc). This already sounds like jms integration to me. I was thinking about that in the beginning, if further QoS capabilities can be delegated to an JMS instance. we've just created a patch to track notification failures through the SubscriptionManager mbean: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWS-1406 bye Alessio Soldano http://www.javalinux.it/blogs/ View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990126#3990126 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990126

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Recent changes to VFS jar processing

by bill.burke＠jboss.com

don't remember. It was one of the tests that test number of bytes read from stream, or something like that... I can't run the testsuite now as I've been doing some VFS work in the code on my laptop View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990101#3990101 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990101

18 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2006